Property agreements for same-sex partners: what they settle, and what makes them binding
Israel has no civil marriage, and same-sex couples cannot marry here. The legal consequence is that their property is not governed by a statutory default, but reconstructed after the fact from conduct. A written agreement replaces that reconstruction with a settled arrangement.
"For a married couple the statute supplies a default. For same-sex partners who have not married there is no default, so the agreement is not a luxury - it is the source of the arrangement."
Adv. Esther Efrati · Head of the Family and Inheritance Department
Why the agreement matters here
Every couple has reason to put their financial arrangements in writing, but for same-sex partners the agreement does additional work. For a married couple the statute supplies a default property regime that applies even if the parties never discussed it. Same-sex partners who have not married fall outside that default, so in the absence of an agreement the question of what belongs to whom is answered retrospectively, from how the parties actually lived.
Beyond the property arrangement itself, a written agreement serves two further purposes that matter particularly here:
- It records the relationship and its starting date. A great deal turns on when a shared life began, from social rights to the scope of sharing. A signed and dated agreement is written evidence of that, instead of a later reconstruction from bank statements and photographs.
- It provides certainty towards third parties. Institutions, employers and financial bodies sometimes have to decide whether two people are recognised partners. An agreement does not bind them, but it is an orderly document that can be produced, rather than relying on testimony alone.
One point should be stated plainly: a property agreement does not create personal status and is not a substitute for marriage. It governs the economic relationship between the parties, and nothing else.
Status: marriage, registration and cohabitation
Israel has no civil marriage track. Marriage is conducted under the religious law of the parties, and the religious authorities do not marry same-sex couples. In practice, same-sex couples in Israel live in one of two situations: as recognised cohabiting partners, or as a couple married in a civil ceremony outside Israel.
Case law extended the cohabitation framework to same-sex partners in stages. In HCJ 721/94 El Al v. Danilowitz the Supreme Court held that a same-sex partner was entitled to a benefit an employer granted to the partners of its employees, based on the relationship as it actually existed rather than on formal status. A similar approach has since been applied in other contexts.
As to registration, in HCJ 3045/05 Ben-Ari v. Director of the Population Administration the court held that the registrar must record in the population registry a same-sex marriage performed abroad. The court emphasised that registration is a statistical and administrative act, and is not a determination that the marriage is valid in Israel. That distinction recurs in practice, and it is important not to read more into it than it holds.
The practical conclusion is that there is no single starting point. Before drafting, one has to establish which track the couple are on, what the registry records, and what that means for the law that will govern them.
Which law governs the property
The Spouses (Property Relations) Law, 1973 applies to couples who married. It creates a resource balancing arrangement: sharing does not occur during the marriage but is deferred to its termination, at which point the value of the assets accumulated is balanced. That is the default from which a marital property agreement departs.
Couples who did not marry are outside that arrangement. Their property relations are examined under general contract and property law and under the case law of sharing, which asks what the parties actually intended. That examination is made after the fact and on the evidence: joint accounts, who funded what, contribution to an asset, the pattern of shared economic life.
- What this means in practice. Without an agreement, the decision on what is shared and what is separate is taken years later, by an outside body, on an incomplete evidentiary record.
- What the agreement does. It replaces that exercise with a written arrangement, settled in real time by the people who know the facts.
For same-sex partners married abroad, whether the Property Relations Law applies is a more complex question that also engages private international law. It has to be examined on the specific facts rather than assumed either way, and the agreement can be drafted to hold up under both possibilities.
Writing, approval and validity
This is where the two tracks differ most, and it is a common source of confusion. For married couples the statute imposes two cumulative requirements: the agreement and any amendment must be in writing, and the agreement requires approval by an authorised body whose task is to satisfy itself that both parties understood its meaning and its consequences and signed freely.
For partners who have not married the position is different. Their agreement is a contract, and it is valid under general contract law without approval. Approval is not a condition of validity. Even so, there is a strong practical case for applying to the family court for approval:
- Enforcement. An agreement that has been approved and given the force of a judgment can be enforced directly, instead of requiring a fresh contractual claim.
- Fewer later disputes. The approval process records that the parties understood the agreement and signed freely, which makes later claims of pressure, misrepresentation or misunderstanding harder to sustain.
- A fixed date. Approval establishes a clear point in time from which the arrangement is measured.
Two further points are worth insisting on: separate representation for each party, and documented disclosure of assets and debts. These are the most common grounds on which agreements are later attacked, and dealing with them at the drafting stage is far simpler than dealing with them in court.
What the agreement should cover
A good agreement is not a long one. It addresses the points where a future dispute is realistic and leaves the rest to life. These are the subjects that recur in almost every file:
- The date the shared life began. The starting point from which everything else is measured. It is worth investing in one precise sentence.
- Pre-existing property. Assets, savings and inheritances each party brought with them, and whether and on what terms they become shared.
- The home. Who is the registered owner, who pays the mortgage, how one party's investment in the other's asset is credited, and what happens on separation.
- Accounts and income. A joint account alongside separate accounts, and how shared expenses are run.
- Pension and long-term savings. Routinely postponed, and usually the most significant asset of all.
- A business. If one party owns a business, its status and the treatment of any increase in value during the relationship should be settled.
- Debts. Both those predating the relationship and those incurred during it.
- The separation mechanism. How division is carried out, on what timetable, and how disputes are resolved - for example mediation before any claim is filed.
Mutual financial support for a period after separation can also be agreed. That is a contractual arrangement between adults, and it is different in kind from child support.
What it cannot settle
Alongside what the agreement does, there are matters it cannot decide. Knowing this in advance avoids building expectations on a clause that will not hold.
- Inheritance. The distribution of an estate cannot be settled by agreement. The Succession Law provides that an arrangement concerning a person's inheritance made otherwise than by a will is of no effect. The correct instrument is a will. A recognised cohabiting partner may inherit where the statutory conditions are met, but that provision is applied after the fact and on conditions, and it is no substitute for a will.
- Child support, custody and parenting time. Understandings can be recorded, but they do not bind the court. It examines these matters by reference to the welfare of the child and is not bound by the parents' agreement.
- Third-party rights. The agreement binds the parties to it alone. It does not change a creditor's position and does not override a bank's charge over an asset.
- Personal status. The agreement does not create a marriage and does not confer status. It governs economic relations.
The right response to these limits is not to give up but to supplement. A property agreement alongside mutual wills, and where appropriate a durable power of attorney, together produce a more complete picture than any single document. See wills and inheritance and durable power of attorney.
Parenthood and children
Many same-sex families arrive at parenthood through one of several routes: surrogacy, adoption, fertility treatment, or a co-parenting arrangement with a third party. Each route has its own legal process, and the property agreement replaces none of them.
Two things should be kept apart:
- Parental status. Established in a separate legal process - a parentage order, adoption or registration as the case may be. A property agreement does not confer parental status on a partner who is not registered as a parent, and cannot do so.
- The financial side. How expenses are shared between the partners can and should be settled in the agreement. The duty of support owed to the child, however, is determined by law and by the court.
Where there are children, the documents should be co-ordinated: the property agreement, the process that establishes parenthood, and the wills. A mismatch between them is a common source of trouble. On the arrangements themselves see shared parenting and custody and parenting time.
Marriage abroad and registration
Many couples choose to marry in a civil ceremony outside Israel. After the ceremony an application is made to record the marriage in the population registry. As the case law holds, registration is an administrative act and does not determine the validity of the marriage under Israeli law.
Several practical conclusions follow:
- Do not treat registration as a substitute for an arrangement. Registration says nothing about the division of property. A written agreement is needed to exactly the same extent.
- Keep the documents. The original marriage certificate, an apostille and a notarised translation are often required years later.
- Dissolution. A relationship formed in a civil ceremony abroad is not dissolved by a religious court. The appropriate route depends on the parties' circumstances and on the law applicable to them, and has to be examined case by case. See also dissolution of marriage.
An agreement made before or after the ceremony can address this expressly, and fix what will apply to the property regardless of how the relationship is later classified.
In summary
For same-sex partners the agreement does not depart from an existing default - it creates one. Without it, the division of property is decided after the fact, on evidence of conduct, in a long and uncertain process.
- For partners who have not married, the agreement is valid as a contract even without approval, but approval by the family court gives it the force of a judgment and makes enforcement far simpler.
- Inheritance, child support and custody are not matters the agreement can decide. Those require other instruments.
- Separate representation for each party and full disclosure of assets and debts are the investment that prevents most future disputes.
- Co-ordinating the property agreement, the wills and the process that establishes parenthood matters as much as any one of them on its own.
Our department assists couples in drafting the agreement, obtaining its approval and aligning it with their wills and parenting arrangements. An initial consultation meeting establishes what a particular file requires before any drafting begins.
What people ask most often
Can same-sex couples marry in Israel?
Does a property agreement between same-sex partners need court approval?
What happens if there is no agreement at all?
Can the agreement determine who inherits from whom?
Can the agreement fix child support and custody?
We married abroad. Does the Property Relations Law apply to us?
What does registration of the marriage in the population registry mean?
From when is the shared life counted?
Does each party need a separate lawyer?
What happens to a home one partner bought before the relationship?
We are parents through surrogacy. Does the agreement settle parenthood?
Can an agreement be made after years of living together?
All pages in the Family and Inheritance department
The separation itself
The divorce processLeaving home before divorceReconciliation or divorceRequest for dispute resolutionDissolution of marriageEconomic abuseRestraining orderBreach of a divorce agreementThe children
Child supportChild support claimIncreasing or reducing supportSupport for a child born outside marriageCollecting support through National InsuranceSpreading a maintenance debtCustody and parenting timeShared parentingThe tender years presumptionChanging a custody arrangementRelocating abroad with the childrenParental alienationDealing with an alienating parentGuardian ad litemSurrogacyPaternity claimThe Youth (Care and Supervision) LawVisual parenting plan builderProperty and agreements
Prenuptial agreementSame sex prenuptial agreementSame-sex marriageNotarised prenuptial agreementDissolution of joint ownershipCareer assets and goodwillSelling the apartment on divorceCommon law partnersInheritance and estate planning
Wills and inheritanceInheritance between same-sex partnersEstate planningWills in estate planningIntergenerational transfer in estate planningTrustsDynasty trustSpecial needs trustInheritance orderProbate orderAgreements between heirsInheritance disputes between siblingsContesting a willNo-contest clause in a willAn agreement matched to the track you are on
Before drafting, it is worth establishing the status, which law applies, and what is needed for the agreement to hold. An initial consultation meeting does exactly that.