Intergenerational transfer in estate planning: timing, structure and protection
Most families think about who receives what. In estate planning that is the easy question. The hard ones are when to transfer, in what structure, and what protects the asset once it has passed.
"A successful transfer is measured years after the signature, not at the moment of it. What is tested is whether the asset still serves the person it was meant for."
Adv. and Notary Igal Mor
What intergenerational transfer means in estate planning
Intergenerational transfer is the passing of wealth from one generation to the next. In estate planning it is examined not only as a question of division, but as a question of timing, of structure and of protection: when to transfer, in what form, and what ensures the asset serves the next generation rather than disappearing along the way.
Three axes make up every such plan:
- Timing. During lifetime, after death, or a staged combination of the two.
- Structure. A direct transfer, holding through a trust, or a transfer subject to conditions.
- Protection. What happens to the asset if the child divorces, runs into difficulty, or cannot manage it.
Separating the three is what makes the subject capable of being planned. Most families think only about the division, and that is in fact the easiest of the three.
During lifetime or after death
The two routes are not competitors. They serve different purposes, and an orderly plan uses both.
- Transfer during lifetime. It allows the next generation to be observed managing the asset, to be guided, and corrections to be made. It also takes the asset out of the estate and narrows the scope for future dispute. The price is giving up control and personal financial security.
- Transfer on death. It leaves the transferor full control during life and the flexibility to change their mind. The price is that it is examined only once they can no longer explain what they meant.
The accepted route is gradual: part is transferred during lifetime, at a level that does not undermine the transferor's own security, and the remainder is settled by will. That preserves both the ability to guide and the room to correct.
Gifts during lifetime
A transfer during lifetime is usually made by gift. The Gift Law, 1968 distinguishes a completed gift from an undertaking to make a future gift, and that distinction determines what can still be changed and what cannot.
- A completed gift. It is complete once the asset has been vested in the recipient. For registered land, completion is on registration. From that moment the asset is no longer the giver's.
- An undertaking to make a future gift. It requires a written document. So long as the recipient has not changed their position in reliance on it, the giver may retract, unless they waived that right in writing.
- Further grounds for retraction. The statute also recognises reprehensible conduct by the recipient towards the giver or their family, and a substantial deterioration in the giver's financial position.
Two accepted options exist for someone who wants to transfer without giving up entirely: reserving a right of residence or use in the property, and transferring in stages. Both are put in writing and settled in advance.
Tax aspects
Tax is not an adjunct to the transfer; it often determines how and when the transfer is carried out.
- There is no estate tax. Estate tax was abolished in 1981, and receiving an asset by inheritance is not in itself a taxable event. The tax is not cancelled, however, only deferred: the heir steps into the deceased's shoes for acquisition value and acquisition date, and tax may arise on a later sale.
- Transfer without consideration to a relative. Section 62 of the Land Taxation (Appreciation and Acquisition) Law, 1963 exempts from appreciation tax a transfer of a right in land without consideration to a relative. The definition covers a spouse, parent, grandparent and descendants; a sibling is included only where the right came from a parent or grandparent, by inheritance or as a gift. The exemption does not extend to acquisition tax, charged at a reduced rate.
- Shares and other assets. Governed by different tax rules, and not covered by that exemption.
Comparing a lifetime transfer with an inheritance is therefore not only a family question. Sometimes the tax difference between the two routes is larger than the difference on any other consideration, so it is examined with a tax adviser at the planning stage.
Balancing between the children
An equal division and a fair one are not necessarily the same, and most disputes between siblings arise from that gap rather than from the sums involved.
Four points call for a decision in advance:
- Gifts already made during lifetime. Whether they count against the share of the estate or in addition to it. Without a written decision, each sibling will remember it differently.
- Assets that cannot be divided. One flat and three children produces a forced co-ownership. Better to set a mechanism: who receives it, how the value is assessed, and how the others are compensated.
- Different contributions by the children. A child who cared for a parent or worked in the business. That can be taken into account, provided the reasoning is written down.
- Different needs. A child with a disability, or one in a different financial position. Here a trust is usually the appropriate tool. See special needs trusts.
A letter of explanation attached to the will is not binding, but it reduces dispute. A sibling who understands why something was decided finds it harder to attack it.
Protecting the asset in the next generation's hands
Some transfers fail not at the point of transfer but afterwards. The asset passed, and then something happened that had not been allowed for.
- The child's divorce. The Spouses (Property Relations) Law, 1973 excludes from resource balancing assets received by gift or inheritance. The exclusion is a starting point, not immunity: the case law recognises that specific sharing in an excluded asset may be proved. Keeping the asset separate, not mixing it with the couple's assets, and a property agreement all narrow the exposure. See prenuptial and property agreements.
- Financial difficulty. An asset transferred into full ownership is exposed to the recipient's creditors. Holding through a trust is the tool designed for that. See trusts in estate planning.
- Not yet ready to manage. A staged transfer, or a trust with an age or a condition, rather than an outright transfer in one go.
No arrangement guarantees an outcome. What a good arrangement does is narrow the zone of risk and make clear in advance what is meant to happen in each scenario.
The tools and when each is used
No single tool suits every transfer. The choice follows from the timing, from the type of asset, and from how much control is to be retained.
- A will. Governs the estate assets. Simple, changeable, and operative only after death. See wills in estate planning.
- A lifetime gift. Transfers now, subject to the Gift Law and to tax considerations.
- A trust. Separates the economic right from control, and allows value to pass without management passing with it.
- An enduring power of attorney. It transfers no assets, but ensures somebody can manage them if the transferor cannot. See enduring power of attorney.
- Property agreements within the family. They complete the protection of the asset in the next generation's hands.
The tools are complementary rather than alternative. A complete plan will usually include at least three of them, prepared together so that they do not conflict. See estate planning.
When the asset is a business
A business is not an asset like any other. It keeps operating, it supports people, and it is subject to constitutional documents that override the will as far as share transfers are concerned.
Three points set it apart:
- The articles bind the heir. A transfer restriction in the articles applies to a person who receives shares by inheritance too, so the will and the company documents have to be aligned.
- Management is not ownership. Ownership can pass without control passing, through different classes of shares or through a trust.
- Continuity the morning after. An answer is needed to who is authorised to sign and decide immediately after the death, not only to who ultimately inherits.
The full commercial dimension, including the three transfer models and the position of siblings who do not manage, is set out on family businesses and intergenerational transition.
In summary
A successful intergenerational transfer is measured not at the moment of signature but years afterwards. The question is not only who receives what, but when, in what structure, and what protects the asset once it has passed.
- Lifetime transfer and inheritance are not competitors. A staged route combines the two.
- A completed gift cannot be undone in the way an undertaking to give can. The distinction in the Gift Law determines what can still be changed.
- There is no estate tax, but tax is deferred rather than cancelled and may arise on a later sale.
- An equal division is not necessarily a fair one. The reasoning is better written down than merely explained.
- Protection of the asset in the next generation's hands is built in advance, through trusts, staged transfers and property agreements.
The plan brings together succession law, the law of gifts, family law and taxation, and each decision affects the others. It is therefore prepared as a whole rather than as a collection of separate documents.
If you are considering passing property to the next generation, contact us for an initial assessment. We will map the assets, examine the timing and the structure of the transfer, and set out the options available to you.
Questions that recur about intergenerational transfer
These answers are general and do not replace advice on your own file.
Is it better to transfer during lifetime or to leave by will?
Can a gift already made be revoked?
Is there tax on transferring to children?
Is an inheritance protected if the child divorces?
How do you balance children who received different amounts during lifetime?
What do you do with one flat and three children?
What is best where a child has a disability?
Can ownership pass while control is retained?
What happens to shares in a family company that pass by inheritance?
Does a letter of explanation with the will help?
When should planning begin?
How long does the process take?
All pages in the Family and Inheritance department
The separation itself
The divorce processLeaving home before divorceReconciliation or divorceRequest for dispute resolutionDissolution of marriageEconomic abuseRestraining orderThe children
Child supportChild support claimIncreasing or reducing supportSupport for a child born outside marriageCollecting support through National InsuranceSpreading a maintenance debtCustody and parenting timeShared parentingThe tender years presumptionChanging a custody arrangementRelocating abroad with the childrenParental alienationDealing with an alienating parentGuardian ad litemSurrogacyPaternity claimThe Youth (Care and Supervision) LawVisual parenting plan builderProperty and agreements
Prenuptial agreementSame sex prenuptial agreementSame-sex marriageNotarised prenuptial agreementDissolution of joint ownershipCareer assets and goodwillSelling the apartment on divorceCommon law partnersInheritance and estate planning
Wills and inheritanceInheritance between same-sex partnersEstate planningWills in estate planningIntergenerational transfer in estate planningTrustsDynasty trustSpecial needs trustProbate orderAgreements between heirsContesting a willNo-contest clause in a willSettle the timing and the structure before drafting
An initial assessment call maps the assets, examines the tax question and the degree of protection required, and lets you decide what passes now and what is settled by will.