Officers' Responsibilities: Personal Liability in Israeli Corporate Law
A fundamental principle of corporate law holds that actions taken by corporate officers are attributed to the corporation itself. Since the corporation bears legal responsibility for its officers’ conduct, the corporation — not the individual — typically faces liability. But does this rule always apply, or are there exceptions? In this article, we examine when corporate officers may face personal liability despite acting on behalf of the company.
By Igal Mor, Adv. & Notary
Accuracy in Legal Advice. Excellence in legal support.
The Fiduciary Duty Ensures That a Director Does Not Abuse Power for Personal Benefit. The Duty of Care Ensures That No Harm Is Caused to the Company. Even If a Director Causes No Damage, a Breach of Fiduciary Duty May Still Occur.
— The Honorable President (ret.) Judge A. Buchbinder et al. v. the Official Receiver as Liquidator of Bank of North America, CA 610/94
The Organ Theory in Corporate Law
Section 47 of the Israeli Companies Law provides that the actions of a company’s organs constitute the actions of the company itself. Corporate officers — including the CEO — belong to this group of corporate organs, alongside the general assembly, the board of directors, and any person whose actions on a particular matter are deemed to be the company’s actions under law or the company’s articles of association.
While this attribution principle appears logical and fair, since officers act on behalf of and for the benefit of the company, it does not grant blanket immunity from personal liability. There are circumstances in which an officer may bear personal contractual or tort liability even when acting within the scope of their duties. Understanding when and how this personal exposure arises is essential for every corporate officer and director.
Personal Liability Under Contract Law
As a general rule, when a company enters into a contract and subsequently breaches it, the contractual cause of action lies against the company — not against the individual officer. While the officer may be the person who physically signs the agreement, they do so on behalf of the corporation. However, under certain circumstances, the officer may be held personally liable, allowing the injured party to file a claim against both the company and the individual. This may occur when it can be demonstrated that the breach of contract was caused by the officer’s personal act or omission — for example, when the officer used deception or misrepresentation to induce the contract, or acted in bad faith during negotiations or performance.
The Courts' Cautious Approach
Israeli courts recognize that, under certain circumstances, an officer may bear personal contractual liability even though the contract was executed on behalf of and for the benefit of the company. In such cases, the third party acquires an independent right of action against the officer. This represents an exception to the organ theory, which ordinarily treats the acts of a corporate organ as the acts of the company itself. Accordingly, courts apply a narrow and strict standard, exercising considerable caution before imposing personal contractual liability on an officer. A broader approach would risk undermining the fundamental principle of separate legal personality upon which corporate law is built.
Precautionary Measures for Corporate Officers
To minimize the risk of personal contractual liability, corporate officers should exercise heightened caution in all dealings with third parties. Officers should avoid making unplanned or informal statements on behalf of the corporation that could be interpreted as personal commitments. Every commitment made on behalf of the company should be precise, clearly attributed to the corporate entity, and documented in writing to prevent misunderstandings or ambiguity. The line between corporate and personal liability can be remarkably thin, which is why ongoing legal guidance is essential for officers seeking to minimize their personal risk and exposure.
Personal Liability for Torts
As with contractual liability, the general rule provides that an officer’s actions are attributed to the corporation. However, an officer is not immune from personal tort liability if they personally committed a tortious act — such as negligence — in the course of their duties. Tort liability is imposed on officers to deter negligent conduct and to establish ethical and professional management standards. To establish tort liability against an officer, it must be demonstrated that the individual was personally responsible for the wrongful conduct that caused the damage at issue. Israeli courts apply careful scrutiny before imposing personal tort liability, both to preserve the principle of separate legal personality and to avoid excessive deterrence that could discourage qualified individuals from serving as corporate officers.
If you require legal counsel regarding officer liability or corporate governance obligations, please contact our office.
Adv. Mor & Co.’s commercial law department has extensive experience representing entrepreneurs, businesses, and corporations — both in Israel and internationally — across all areas of corporate and commercial law. Contact us by calling 02-595-3322 or messaging us on WhatsApp at 050-811-6181.